The AI Moratorium: Is Washington Quietly Disarming the States?
The Team @ Sherloc Research Breaks Down The "Big Beautiful Bill" With A Nasty Surprise Inside... Read, Share, & Subscribe - SherlocExposes.com
Get #Goldbacks from TheGoldBackStore.com & support Watchmen Action!
Unlike most gold products, the Goldback is designed to be used as a currency with interchangeable denominations rather than varying premiums based on gold content.
Yesterday, what may turn out to be one of the most important stories of the decade was dropped onto us like a ton of bricks.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a wide-ranging legislative package that, on the surface, reads like a patriotic call to modernize government and secure America’s technological future.
Tucked away inside, however, is a provision that deserves far more scrutiny than it’s getting: a 10-year federal moratorium on all state-level regulation of artificial intelligence.
Ten years. Fifty states. Zero autonomy.
The story being sold to the American people is that this moratorium is necessary to “avoid regulatory confusion” and “support innovation.”
But dig even a little beneath the surface, and a far more troubling narrative emerges - one that calls into question who actually governs America, and whether states still have the power to protect their own citizens in a rapidly advancing digital age.
THE OFFICIAL STORY: A UNIFIED FRONT FOR INNOVATION
Supporters of the bill, from both sides of the aisle, have repeated the same talking points: the U.S. needs a “national strategy” for AI. Tech companies can't be expected to comply with fifty different sets of rules. Regulation, if it's going to happen, “must be done from Washington to ensure “consistency.”
“Without a unified approach, we risk falling behind our global competitors,” said one House sponsor, referencing China’s aggressive state-led AI development.
At a glance, that sounds reasonable. After all, who wants to lose the next space race?
But what’s missing from this version of the story is what happens when “unified” becomes “unaccountable.”
When states are told they can’t act to protect their citizens from technologies moving faster than most lawmakers can comprehend. And when all the power - not just over the economy, but over identity, speech, and surveillance, is concentrated in a few centralized agencies and boardrooms in D.C. and Silicon Valley.
WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO ASK
Let’s start with the basics: What exactly does the moratorium do?
In plain English, this provision prevents any U.S. state from creating or enforcing its own AI laws for a decade.
That means California’s rules on deepfakes, Florida’s restrictions on AI use in education, Texas’s bans on AI-led surveillance - all of it would be frozen.
“This bill says to every state: sit down, be quiet, and wait ten years while we figure it out for you,” said Tennessee State Senator Blake Marsh, who authored that state’s widely praised “Elvis Act” to protect against AI voice and image impersonation.
And what happens during those ten years? That’s not clear.
The bill doesn’t guarantee any federal regulation in the meantime. It doesn’t promise national protections against AI abuse, bias, censorship, or surveillance. It just promises that states won’t be allowed to act.
This isn’t regulation - it’s something else... that’s not good.
THE PRICE OF PREEMPTION
Let’s be clear: AI isn’t just about smart assistants or writing tools anymore. It’s about how our identities are authenticated, how our communications are monitored, how our elections are conducted, how our children are educated, and how our purchases and beliefs are tracked and profiled.
To prevent states from acting in these areas is not a matter of "efficiency." It's a calculated decision to remove local resistance from the equation.
It’s about neutralizing 50 potential brakes on the machinery of centralized control.
What this bill essentially does is treat AI as if it were nuclear policy - too big, too complex, too dangerous for the states to handle. But unlike nuclear weapons, AI isn’t locked away in silos or bunkers. It’s already in your phone. Your bank. Your school. Your job application. Your church.
So when a state tries to pass a law to protect its citizens from abuses - say, a facial recognition system at public schools, or an AI tool used to deny housing to certain demographics - that state would now be legally prohibited from doing so.
“It’s a digital gag order,” said one civil liberties attorney, who asked not to be named. “The federal government is not regulating AI. It’s regulating your right to regulate it.”
THE GLOBAL TEMPLATE: ARE WE FOLLOWING CHINA’S PLAYBOOK?
This may sound alarmist -until you look overseas.
In China, AI is regulated entirely at the national level. It’s used to create loyalty scores, manage dissent, and automate censorship. In Europe, AI regulation is similarly being centralized through sweeping EU laws that supersede local authority.
Why is this significant?
Because centralization is the prerequisite for digital governance. You can’t build a top-down system of surveillance, speech control, and behavioral nudging if every town and state can block it. You need a blank canvas. This moratorium gives Washington that blank canvas.
It’s not that the AI provision of this bill is evil on its face. It’s that it fits into a pattern… a pattern of consolidating decision-making into fewer and fewer hands, under the guise of safety, innovation, or unity.
We’ve seen this pattern before.
COVID emergency powers. Election centralization. ESG scoring in finance. Proposed digital currency pilots.
Now, AI.
THE POLITICAL STRATEGY: WRAP IT IN A BIGGER PACKAGE
It’s no accident that this AI provision was bundled into a larger omnibus bill.
Lawmakers know that the AI portion wouldn’t survive on its own. So they wrapped it in popular measures - funding for veterans, infrastructure, national defense -to make it politically toxic to oppose.
“Vote against this bill,” a staffer told one House member, “and you’re voting against helping veterans.”
This is legislative hostage-taking.
It’s how deeply unpopular ideas become law… by being buried in the fine print of something no one dares vote against.
And because the AI issue is still murky to most Americans, there’s little political cost in sneaking it through.
LANDING THE PLANE: WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOU?
If you’re waiting for the dystopian moment when the government tells you what you can and can’t say using AI… don’t.
It’s already here - just harder to see.
It’s when your state is blocked from protecting your voice, your likeness, your data.
It’s when the companies you rely on are told to follow only one set of rules, and it’s not yours.
It’s when you look up one day and realize that everything AI touches… from your credit score to your pastor’s sermon… has been quietly funneled through Washington, D.C.
Ask yourself:
- What happens when that centralized system makes a mistake?
- What happens when it’s abused?
- What happens when you don’t agree with the rules?
- And most importantly: What happens when you want to opt out—but your state is no longer allowed to help you do it?
These are the questions we need to be asking. Not in ten years. Today.
SHERLOC RESEARCH: KNOW WHAT’S COMING… BEFORE IT ARRIVES
At Sherloc Market Research, we don’t just track trends - we trace the strategy behind the headlines. We’ve been ahead of the curve on central bank digital currencies, ESG financial coercion, and now, the AI centralization wave.
If you want to understand not just what is happening, but why, and how it fits into the bigger picture of state sovereignty, global consolidation, and the coming economic realignment… Ask Sherloc.
James Wesley, Rawles, publisher of SurvivalBlog.com has put together a “bookshelf” list of key things you should have. CLICK HERE to access the list.
Plus a recap of the 50 things you should have handy to barter.
Share this email with everyone you know. Sign up for a free or paid subscription. Paid members will receive our in-depth solutions.
Ripped From The Headlines is your daily digest of what’s happening in the world. We help you to understand what it means, why you should care, and what you should do.
The cabal in and behind the federal government wants to get their boot on our necks for 10 years. And then take the head off.